Legal Responsibility of Livestock Owners for Crop Damage: An Analysis of Article 84 (1) Qanun No. 3/2013 in Pidie Jaya

Alvi Farisyi; M.  Syuib; Muhammad  Iqbal; Ming Chou  Liu

doi:10.63142/al-battar.v3i1.507

Authors

Alvi Farisyi Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia Author
M. Syuib Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia Author
Muhammad Iqbal Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia Author
Ming Chou Liu National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63142/al-battar.v3i1.507

Keywords:

Normative Reconstruction, Customary Dispute Resolution, Islamic Legal Perspective, Legal Pluralism, Regional Qanun

Abstract

The formulation of qanun as a regional legal product should not only regulate administrative matters but also accommodate the living law within society. Article 84 paragraph (1) of Qanun of Pidie Jaya Regency Number 3 of 2013 recognizes that disputes related to livestock and animal health may be resolved through customary mechanisms. However, this recognition raises normative problems because it is not accompanied by clear regulations regarding implementation mechanisms, institutional integration, or the legal status of customary dispute settlements within the formal legal system. From the perspective of legal pluralism theory and legal norm theory, this condition indicates that the provision remains declarative rather than operational. This study aims to analyze the normative construction of the article and formulate a more operational normative reconstruction. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that Article 84 paragraph (1) does not regulate dispute settlement procedures, coordination between customary institutions and regional government authorities, or the legal consequences of customary settlement outcomes. Consequently, its effectiveness relies more on the social legitimacy of customary law than on formal legal structures. This study proposes a normative reconstruction emphasizing procedural clarity, documentation of customary deliberations, and institutional integration to strengthen legal certainty and harmonization between state law and customary law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alvi Farisyi, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
M. Syuib, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Muhammad Iqbal, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Ming Chou Liu, National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan

National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan

References

Agustina, Rosa. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 39, no. 3 (2009): 352–53. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol39.no3.198.

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.

———. Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Anggraeni, Rr Dewi. “Islamic Law and Customary Law in Contemporary Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Tension and Constraints.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 23, no. 1 (2023): 25–48. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.32549.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.

Atmadja, I Dewa Gede. “Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 17, no. 3 (2010): 368–69. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss3.art2.

Bellamy, Richard, and Sandra Kröger. “Countering Democratic Backsliding by EU Member States: Constitutional Pluralism and ‘Value’ Differentiated Integration.” Swiss Political Science Review 27, no. 3 (2021): 619–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12448.

Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von. “Relational Social Theories and Legal Pluralism.” Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2021v1n1.2.

Dancer, Helen. “Harmony with Nature: Towards a New Deep Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53, no. 1 (2021): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1845503.

Djawas, Mursyid, Abidin Nurdin, Muslim Zainuddin, Idham, and Zahratul Idami. “Harmonization of State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Perspective of Legal Pluralism.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824.

Febriandi, Yogi, Muhammad Ansor, and Nursiti. “Seeking Justice through Qanun Jinayat: The Narratives of Female Victims of Sexual Violence in Aceh, Indonesia.” Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies 9, no. 1 (2021): 103–40. https://doi.org/10.21043/QIJIS.V9I1.8029.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Howse, Robert, and Joanna Langille. “Continuity and Change in the World Trade Organization: Pluralism Past, Present, and Future.” American Journal of International Law 117, no. 1 (2023): 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.82.

Huda, Ni’matul. Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019.

Indrati Soeprapto, Maria Farida. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, Dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

———. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

Jumarim, Ilyya Muhsin, and Muhammad Chairul Huda. “The Interplay of Fiqh, Adat, and State Marriage Law: Shaping Legal Consciousness of Sasak Women.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 19, no. 2 (2024): 27–52. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v19i1.10522.

Manan, Bagir. Teori Dan Politik Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2003.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.

Muhammad, Bushar. Asas-Asas Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2006.

Nadzir, Muhammad, and Suwandi. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Keterangan Tanah Sebagai Bukti Hak Kepemilikan Atas Tanah.” Journal de Facto 4, no. 1 (2020): 49–70. https://doi.org/10.51747/defacto.v4i1.43.

Negara, T A S. “Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Origins and Approaches.” Audito Comparative Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855.

Nggilu, Novendri M., Wahidullah, Evi Noviawati, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Indonesia’s Constitutional Identity: A Comparative Study of Islamic Constitutionalism.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 16, no. 2 (2024): 480–500. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v16i2.29851.

Nurbaiti, Siti. “Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Mutlak Dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia.” Jurnal Yuridika 28, no. 1 (2013): 15–16. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i1.188.

“Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (Statute Spproach).” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 13, no. 1 (2025): 105.

Pohan, Maulia Permata Rizki. “Metode Penelitian Hukum.” Jurnal Pustaka Galuh Justisi 3, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v10i2.8644.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Dan Masyarakat: Sebuah Pengantar. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.

———. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Ramli, Misran, Syamsul Rijal, Reni Surya, and Irhamni Malika. “State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Minor Dispute Resolution in the Perspective of Legal Pluralism.” Samarah 8, no. 2 (2024): 872–90. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.15924.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2015.

Syahrizal, M. “Eksistensi Hukum Adat Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding 7, no. 2 (2018): 201–3. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v7i2.250.