Analisis Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Gen Z dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di PT XYZ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63142/ekonosfera.v1i4.362Keywords:
Gen Z, Leadership Style, Work Environment, Employee Performance, Digital TransformationAbstract
The ever-evolving work environment demands companies to adapt to new generations entering the labor market, including Generation Z (Gen Z) born between 1997–2012 and now beginning to dominate the workplace with collaborative, flexible, and technology-savvy characteristics. This study aims to analyze the influence of Gen Z leadership style and work environment on employee performance at PT XYZ, which is transitioning to digital. The research method uses a quantitative approach with 60 respondents through a Likert scale questionnaire, analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results show that Gen Z leadership style and work environment simultaneously have a significant effect on employee performance (F = 111.79; p < 0.01), with the partial influence of Gen Z leadership style being more dominant (t = 6.30; p < 0.01) than the work environment (t = 2.63; p < 0.05). The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.8922) indicates that 89.22% of the performance variation can be explained by these two variables, while the remainder is influenced by other factors outside the model. These findings confirm that Gen Z's collaborative, flexible, and technology-based leadership style and comfortable work environment significantly contribute to improved performance, with practical implications for PT XYZ to strengthen leadership strategies and create adaptive work policies in the era of digital transformation.
Downloads
References
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The Role of Leadership in a Digitalized World: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Gabrielova, K., & Buchko, A. A. (2021). Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers. Business Horizons, 64(4), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.013
Gist, M. E., Locke, E. A., & Taylor, M. S. (1987). Organizational Behavior: Group Structure, Process, and Effectiveness. Journal of Management, 13(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300204
Laka, L., Darmansyah, R., Judijanto, L., Lase, J. F., Haluti, F., & Kalip. (n.d.). Pendidikan Karakter Gen Z di Era Digital (Cetakan Pertama (ed.)). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New Generation, Great Expectations: A Field Study of the Millennial Generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4
Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and Practice (Sixth Edit). Sage Publications.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Putri, P. K. (2024). GEN Z DI DUNIA KERJA: Kepribadian dan Motivasi Jadi Penentu Produktivitas Kerja. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Ekonomi & Bisnis, 4(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmeb.v4i1.650
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Smith, T., & Cawthon, T. W. (2017). Generation Z Goes to College. College Student Affairs Journal, 35(1), 101–102. https://doi.org/10.1353/csj.2017.0008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muh Adzam (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












